Finally, the start of the season we’ve all been waiting for. Throw out all the fast times from September, but apply all the lessons learned through the summer and fall. Regional week is here and with it comes the many projections and previews I’ll write.
Just as last year and throughout the season, I’m projecting these using race simulations. Through a season’s worth of speed ratings, one can determine a runner’s average rating and the variability of those ratings. Both those factors are then weighed towards more recent meets, which are then simulated thousands of times using a Monte Carlo analysis (also described by TullyRunners here). Over those thousands of race simulations, one can determine a team’s average place and average score, a runner’s average place, odds on winning, and odds on qualifying.
These are useful in cross country scenarios, where you have consistent runners and those who are a bit more up and down. For example:
| Tanner Time | Tanner Rating | Tanner Avg. | Tanner StDev. |
| 15:30 | 210 | ||
| 15:45 | 205 | ||
| 16:00 | 200 | ||
| 16:15 | 195 | ||
| 16:30 | 190 | 200 | 7.91 |
| MIXCSR Time | MIXCSR Rating | MIXCSR Avg. | MIXCSR StDev. |
| 16:09 | 197 | ||
| 16:12 | 196 | ||
| 16:15 | 195 | ||
| 16:18 | 194 | ||
| 16:21 | 193 | 195 | 1.58 |
Jacob at his best might be faster than I in four of the five races during the season. I’d almost never be All-State in Division 1, but he might contend for a top-5 spot or place 60th.
If we did 20 simulations, this is how it might turn out:
| Race | Tanner Avg. | Tanner StDev | Tanner Rating | MIXCSR Avg. | MIXCSR StDev | MIXCSR Rating |
| 1 | 200 | 7.9 | 202.1 | 195 | 1.6 | 195.6 |
| 2 | 200 | 7.9 | 196.2 | 195 | 1.6 | 194.1 |
| 3 | 200 | 7.9 | 190.0 | 195 | 1.6 | 199.2 |
| 4 | 200 | 7.9 | 193.4 | 195 | 1.6 | 192.5 |
| 5 | 200 | 7.9 | 206.8 | 195 | 1.6 | 195.7 |
| 6 | 200 | 7.9 | 201.8 | 195 | 1.6 | 196.1 |
| 7 | 200 | 7.9 | 171.6 | 195 | 1.6 | 194.9 |
| 8 | 200 | 7.9 | 189.2 | 195 | 1.6 | 195.9 |
| 9 | 200 | 7.9 | 205.5 | 195 | 1.6 | 197.0 |
| 10 | 200 | 7.9 | 203.8 | 195 | 1.6 | 192.6 |
| 11 | 200 | 7.9 | 192.3 | 195 | 1.6 | 196.5 |
| 12 | 200 | 7.9 | 196.9 | 195 | 1.6 | 196.4 |
| 13 | 200 | 7.9 | 198.5 | 195 | 1.6 | 195.6 |
| 14 | 200 | 7.9 | 203.2 | 195 | 1.6 | 194.1 |
| 15 | 200 | 7.9 | 193.9 | 195 | 1.6 | 192.6 |
| 16 | 200 | 7.9 | 199.3 | 195 | 1.6 | 193.2 |
| 17 | 200 | 7.9 | 208.7 | 195 | 1.6 | 194.2 |
| 18 | 200 | 7.9 | 213.7 | 195 | 1.6 | 194.6 |
| 19 | 200 | 7.9 | 212.6 | 195 | 1.6 | 197.1 |
| 20 | 200 | 7.9 | 206.3 | 195 | 1.6 | 193.9 |
I’d win four times, but I’d never have the ability to win a title like he had in Race 18. He’s usually All-State, but may cost his team a title through his effort in Race 7.
The simulations give the possibilities of those scenarios and all the various scoring scripts. A sixth girl that can pop off on any certain day, a reliable boy who always runs 17-flat, you name it. Hopefully, they better elucidate our contenders, qualifiers, and how these races play out over the weekend.
But always remember, races aren’t run on paper or on a computer. These projections are meant to better our sport, give more attention where little is given. Although I take pride in their accuracy, this endeavor would be quite boring if it were always perfect. I look forward to these being proven wrong and I expect to hear about it as well.

GIRLS
Ranked Teams
#22 Croswell-Lexington
#25 Warren Regina
#27 Armada
Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff
19th Place in the case of both Armada and St. Clair being the third team.
| Projected Place | Team | Avg. Score | Avg. Place | Win % | Top 3 % |
| 1 | Croswell-Lexington | 58 | 1.6 | 45 | 95+ |
| 2 | Warren Regina | 59 | 1.7 | 43 | 95+ |
| 3 | Armada | 72 | 3.0 | 12 | 71 |
| 4 | St. Clair | 82 | 3.7 | 30 | |
| 5 | Macomb Lutheran North | 120 | 5.0 | ||
| 6 | Marysville | 153 | 6.3 | ||
| 7 | Richmond | 160 | 6.7 | ||
| 8 | Marine City | 225 | 8.2 | ||
| 9 | Yale | 237 | 8.9 | ||
| 10 | Madison Heights Lamphere | 279 | 9.9 | ||
| 11 | St. Clair Shores Lake Shore | 331 | 11.0 | ||
| 12 | Harper Woods | 373 | 12.0 |
| Projected Place | Grade | Name | Team | Avg. Place |
| 1 | 11 | Eva Thompson | Croswell-Lexington | 1.4 |
| 2 | 12 | Ava Baltierra | Armada | 2.0 |
| 3 | 12 | Morgan Newton | Croswell-Lexington | 3.3 |
| 4 | 11 | Brooklyn Khon | Armada | 5.6 |
| 5 | 11 | Elizabeth Ambroggio | Warren Regina | 6.0 |
| 6 | 12 | Kennedy Roskopp | Warren Regina | 7.2 |
| 7 | 11 | Brynn Hurley | Croswell-Lexington | 7.5 |
| 8 | 12 | Lilyana Bratt | St. Clair | 8.6 |
| 9 | 11 | Lillian Rutallie | Marysville | 9.4 |
| 10 | 12 | Samantha Kook | Armada | 9.6 |
| 11 | 11 | Natalie Lentine | Warren Regina | 11.3 |
| 12 | 9 | Samantha Whitlam | Macomb Lutheran North | 11.7 |
| 13 | 9 | Gabriella Komarowski | St. Clair | 14.4 |
| 14 | 11 | Lorelei Mahon | Warren Regina | 14.8 |
| 15 | 12 | Brianna Albers | Richmond | 15.4 |
| 16 | 11 | Allie Komarowski | St. Clair | 17.9 |
| 17 | 12 | Gabby Fernandez | Warren Regina | 19.7 |
| 18 | 12 | Abagayle Barkley | Croswell-Lexington | 21.3 |
| 19 | 10 | Molly McNabb | St. Clair | 21.4 |
| 20 | 10 | Pauline Chapman | Richmond | 22.1 |
| 21 | 9 | Ella Thornton | St. Clair | 22.3 |
| 22 | 10 | Abigail Denoyer | Armada | 23.2 |
| 23 | 12 | Eliza Nelson | Croswell-Lexington | 25.0 |
| 24 | 12 | Casidhe Flesher | Marine City | 25.7 |
| 25 | 10 | Paulina Chapman | Richmond | 25.8 |
| 26 | 11 | Isabella LaPerriere | Macomb Lutheran North | 26.8 |
| 27 | 12 | Ella Deshon | Marysville | 27.2 |
| 28 | 10 | Aubrey Sargent | St. Clair | 27.6 |
| 29 | 9 | Avery Stallmann | Macomb Lutheran North | 27.9 |
| 30 | 9 | Evelyn Buckley | Macomb Lutheran North | 29.0 |

Anything Intriguing?
One single point separating Warren Regina and Cros-Lex. I have a feeling the Saddlelites are underrated because of their tough stretch of Kensington then County with a two-day break. On the other hand, the Pioneers are your defending champs with upperclass girls ready to defend that crown.
BOYS
Ranked Teams
#19 Yale
#21 St. Clair
Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff
24th place behind the usually strong St. Clair and Yale teams.
| Projected Place | Team | Avg. Score | Avg. Place | Win % | Top 3 % |
| 1 | Yale | 37 | 1.2 | 76 | 95+ |
| 2 | St. Clair | 40 | 1.8 | 24 | 95+ |
| 3 | Macomb Lutheran North | 74 | 3.0 | 95+ | |
| 4 | Marysville | 160 | 4.8 | ||
| 5 | Madison Heights Lamphere | 164 | 5.2 | ||
| 6 | Marine City | 166 | 5.5 | ||
| 7 | Armada | 174 | 6.5 | ||
| 8 | Richmond | 206 | 8.0 | ||
| 9 | Croswell-Lexington | 237 | 9.1 | ||
| 10 | Harper Woods | 261 | 10.0 | ||
| 11 | Detroit East English | 318 | 11.2 | ||
| 12 | Center Line | 322 | 11.8 |
| Projected Place | Grade | Name | Team | Avg. Place |
| 1 | 12 | Brewer Snay | Macomb Lutheran North | 1.1 |
| 2 | 12 | Blake Ferguson | Yale | 3.1 |
| 3 | 12 | Giovanni Pardo-Keegan | Yale | 3.2 |
| 4 | 12 | Acer Campbell | Yale | 4.0 |
| 5 | 12 | Vinny Schweihofer | St. Clair | 4.6 |
| 6 | 12 | Dylan Distelrath | St. Clair | 5.6 |
| 7 | 12 | Anthony Goatley | Madison Heights Lamphere | 8.4 |
| 8 | 12 | Jamison Snay | Macomb Lutheran North | 8.5 |
| 9 | 11 | Jerry Westrick | St. Clair | 9.8 |
| 10 | 9 | Ethan Kreger | St. Clair | 10.0 |
| 11 | 12 | Dylan Schumann | St. Clair | 10.4 |
| 12 | 11 | Teddy Rutkofske | Yale | 14.6 |
| 13 | 11 | Wyatt Murtos | Yale | 14.9 |
| 14 | 10 | Xavier Roman | Macomb Lutheran North | 15.5 |
| 15 | 11 | Kale Kovach | Yale | 15.6 |
| 16 | 12 | Luke Nawrocki | Armada | 18.3 |
| 17 | 11 | Pete Lutz | Madison Heights Lamphere | 19.6 |
| 18 | 10 | Brayden Prieskorn | St. Clair | 20.6 |
| 19 | 12 | Nathan VanderMeulen | Marysville | 20.6 |
| 20 | 9 | Joshua Macri | Macomb Lutheran North | 20.8 |
| 21 | 11 | Korbyn Thornton | St. Clair | 21.1 |
| 22 | 12 | Alex Robertson | Marine City | 21.8 |
| 23 | 10 | Ross Wallace | Harper Woods | 22.8 |
| 24 | 10 | Nolan Korolden | Yale | 25.0 |
| 25 | 12 | Jayden Robertson | Marine City | 26.3 |
| 26 | 11 | Georgio Aramouni | Madison Heights Lamphere | 26.8 |
| 27 | 9 | Javaris Jackson | Harper Woods | 28.5 |
| 28 | 11 | Grayson Sutherland | Macomb Lutheran North | 28.6 |
| 29 | 12 | Tyler Buckland | Armada | 28.8 |
| 30 | 10 | Dalton Ross | Marine City | 31.9 |

Anything Intriguing?
Another year of the perennial Yale/St. Clair battle. They’re gonna start giving this rivalry a name soon. The team from up north has claimed victory in the three matchups at Muskrat, Portage, and Marysville. But the Saints just raced to PR’s from over 50% of their athletes at Metro Beach.

GIRLS
Ranked Teams
#1 Romeo
#14 Macomb Dakota
#16 Fraser
Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff
23rd place, about as deep into these as you’ll get.
| Projected Place | Team | Avg. Score | Avg. Place | Win % | Top 3 % |
| 1 | Romeo | 20 | 1.0 | 95+ | 95+ |
| 2 | Macomb Dakota | 75 | 2.5 | 95+ | |
| 3 | Fraser | 75 | 2.5 | 95+ | |
| 4 | Rochester Hills Stoney Creek | 118 | 4.1 | ||
| 5 | Grosse Pointe South | 145 | 4.9 | ||
| 6 | Utica Eisenhower | 203 | 6.4 | ||
| 7 | Chippewa Valley | 216 | 7.1 | ||
| 8 | Port Huron Northern | 237 | 8.1 | ||
| 9 | Grosse Pointe North | 243 | 8.5 | ||
| 10 | St. Clair Shores Lakeview | 293 | 10.5 | ||
| 11 | L’Anse Creuse North | 304 | 11.3 | ||
| 12 | Anchor Bay | 304 | 11.3 | ||
| 13 | L’Anse Creuse | 337 | 12.9 |
| Projected Place | Grade | Name | Team | Avg. Place |
| 1 | 9 | Annie Hrabovsky | Romeo | 1.4 |
| 2 | 10 | Natalia Guaresimo | Romeo | 2.5 |
| 3 | 12 | Jayden Harberts | Macomb Dakota | 3.0 |
| 4 | 10 | Emmerson Clor | Romeo | 3.5 |
| 5 | 11 | Violet Hrabovsky | Romeo | 5.5 |
| 6 | 12 | Mariah Belmont | Macomb Dakota | 7.0 |
| 7 | 10 | Leah Corby | Rochester Hills Stoney Creek | 8.1 |
| 8 | 11 | Lillian Deskins | Romeo | 8.2 |
| 9 | 11 | Olivia Purdy | Romeo | 8.9 |
| 10 | 11 | Grace Grupido | Fraser | 9.0 |
| 11 | 10 | Katelyn Frazier | Fraser | 12.5 |
| 12 | 12 | Lauren Thomas | Anchor Bay | 14.4 |
| 13 | 12 | Remi Flanz | Fraser | 15.3 |
| 14 | 10 | Lidia Clancy | Macomb Dakota | 15.5 |
| 15 | 11 | Savannah Spangler | Grosse Pointe South | 16.8 |
| 16 | 12 | Gracie Youngblood | Romeo | 17.0 |
| 17 | 11 | Charlotte Long | Utica Eisenhower | 17.3 |
| 18 | 10 | Olivia Cereska | Fraser | 17.7 |
| 19 | 12 | Sydney Gergics | Rochester Hills Stoney Creek | 20.0 |
| 20 | 9 | Maggie Baginski | Utica Eisenhower | 22.5 |
| 21 | 11 | Julia Timpa | Macomb Dakota | 24.3 |
| 22 | 11 | Luciana Rodriguez | Fraser | 24.3 |
| 23 | 12 | Morgan Deenik | Grosse Pointe South | 26.7 |
| 24 | 9 | Aubrey Rizzo | Macomb Dakota | 27.0 |
| 25 | 11 | Chloe Caulfield | Grosse Pointe South | 27.5 |
| 26 | 12 | Alyssa Ko | Rochester Hills Stoney Creek | 28.1 |
| 27 | 11 | Shelby Stabile | L’Anse Creuse | 28.4 |
| 28 | 12 | Grace Gutmann | Chippewa Valley | 29.0 |
| 29 | 10 | Samantha Langolf | Port Huron Northern | 29.4 |
| 30 | 9 | Lilianna Peace | Chippewa Valley | 29.9 |

Anything Intriguing?
Last year, it was their boys breaking the 36 year drought. Fraser’s girls have a nearly 20 year absence from the State Finals and it appears they’re in prime position to make a return voyage to Brooklyn. Also, does anyone have a clue on these additional qualifiers?
BOYS
Ranked Teams
#8 Romeo
#14 Macomb Dakota
#25 Anchor Bay
Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff
16th Place.
| Projected Place | Team | Avg. Score | Avg. Place | Win % | Top 3 % |
| 1 | Romeo | 59 | 1.3 | 71 | 95+ |
| 2 | Macomb Dakota | 64 | 1.7 | 29 | 95+ |
| 3 | Anchor Bay | 95 | 3.0 | 95+ | |
| 4 | Utica Eisenhower | 165 | 4.9 | ||
| 5 | Grosse Pointe South | 167 | 4.7 | ||
| 6 | L’Anse Creuse North | 184 | 6.2 | ||
| 7 | Port Huron Northern | 193 | 7.1 | ||
| 8 | Chippewa Valley | 209 | 8.3 | ||
| 9 | Grosse Pointe North | 220 | 8.9 | ||
| 10 | Rochester Hills Stoney Creek | 233 | 10.0 | ||
| 11 | Fraser | 237 | 10.0 | ||
| 12 | L’Anse Creuse | 289 | 12.3 | ||
| 13 | St. Clair Shores Lakeview | 303 | 12.6 | ||
| 14 | Warren DeLaSalle | 375 | 14.0 | ||
| 15 | Warren Woods Tower | 447 | 15.0 | ||
| 16 | Roseville | 527 | 16.4 | ||
| 17 | Port Huron | 532 | 16.7 |
| Projected Place | Grade | Name | Team | Avg. Place |
| 1 | 12 | Thomas Westphal | Anchor Bay | 1.4 |
| 2 | 12 | Vincent Guaresimo | Romeo | 1.8 |
| 3 | 12 | Carter Fox | Macomb Dakota | 3.6 |
| 4 | 12 | Connor Clor | Romeo | 4.2 |
| 5 | 12 | Tyler Brothers | Utica Eisenhower | 6.2 |
| 6 | 12 | Dylan Penberthy | L’Anse Creuse North | 7.2 |
| 7 | 12 | Simon Davis | Macomb Dakota | 8.3 |
| 8 | 12 | Jack DeWaele | Chippewa Valley | 10.4 |
| 9 | 11 | Lucas LaMilza | Macomb Dakota | 11.1 |
| 10 | 12 | Luke Oyster | Utica Eisenhower | 11.2 |
| 11 | 12 | Brandon Penberthy | L’Anse Creuse North | 11.2 |
| 12 | 11 | Colton Howell | Macomb Dakota | 12.0 |
| 13 | 12 | Bryce Goodsell | Romeo | 13.1 |
| 14 | 12 | Zachary Rubicz | Anchor Bay | 14.8 |
| 15 | 12 | Luke VanderHeuvel | Port Huron Northern | 15.9 |
| 16 | 10 | Brock Washburn | Rochester Hills Stoney Creek | 17.9 |
| 17 | 12 | Luke Maher | Port Huron Northern | 20.5 |
| 18 | 10 | Luke Allen | Romeo | 21.0 |
| 19 | 12 | Michael Magnoli | Romeo | 21.1 |
| 20 | 11 | Aidan Daly | L’Anse Creuse | 21.7 |
| 21 | 12 | Jet Miller | Grosse Pointe South | 22.5 |
| 22 | 12 | Tommy Caulfield | Grosse Pointe South | 23.0 |
| 23 | 12 | Aidan Leslie | Anchor Bay | 24.1 |
| 24 | 11 | Greg Vogt | Anchor Bay | 24.7 |
| 25 | 11 | Caleb Kosel | Grosse Pointe North | 25.4 |
| 26 | 10 | Eric DeWaele | Chippewa Valley | 25.6 |
| 27 | 12 | David Rochon | Grosse Pointe North | 28.1 |
| 28 | 10 | James Brickel | Romeo | 28.6 |
| 29 | 10 | Lance Edghill | Fraser | 29.5 |
| 30 | 12 | Gabe Rusch | Anchor Bay | 30.0 |

Anything Intriguing?
The championship rubber match between Macomb Dakota and Romeo. Thanks to an ever-improving Bryce Goodsell, the Bulldogs captured the County crown. Lucas LaMilza and Colton Howell had big efforts in the Cougar win at The Beach. Who steps up to grab this trophy?
3 thoughts on “2023 Regional Projections: Anchor Bay Regional”