Blog

This batch uses 2020’s ratings and takes the outgoing seniors out of the equation. There are some teams (Clinton boys and girls, for example) that I believe were underrated throughout the season by my methods. As a consequence, they’ll probably be a bit undervalued here. But hopefully this gives a better picture than your athletic.net hypothetical.

Hart has some 8th grade girls ready to contribute and I’m sure they’ll be up closer to the front once I add them. Preemptively letting you know before the comments roll in.

GIRLS

BOYS

This batch uses 2020’s ratings and takes the outgoing seniors out of the equation. There are some teams (Lansing Catholic girls and Riverview boys, for example) that I believe were underrated throughout the season by my methods. As a consequence, they’ll probably be a bit undervalued here. But hopefully this gives a better picture than your athletic.net hypothetical.

GIRLS

BOYS

I’m still here. The photoshops are going well, learning very gradually, but I wanted to take a break from those to look forward to next year. Here’s how I want to go about the previews and pre-season rankings this time around:

• December
  • Just the returners, using the 2020 season
• Before Track
  • Projected improvement + 8^th graders added in
• After Track
  • Track added in
• Summer
  • Regional Previews, 50 Tickets, etc.

This batch uses 2020’s ratings and takes the outgoing seniors out of the equation. There are some teams (Clarkston girls and Davison boys, for example) that I believe were underrated throughout the season by my methods. As a consequence, they’ll probably be a bit undervalued here. But hopefully this gives a better picture than your athletic.net hypothetical.

GIRLS

(girls run first in 2021)

BOYS