Track is back and we’re here with more rounds of our Best Crew rankings. These started in 2022 with one version, then in 2023, I used this current method, which was much more efficient, easy to tabulate and calculate. What these aim to do is recognize which teams excel in their various event areas – whether that be jumps, throws, or sprints.
The explanation from 2023 is spot on, so click here if you want to read the recipe for how these are created.
Here are the figures that show the points for each mark:
These contain results uploaded to athletic.net by Tuesday (4/9) morning. Still trying to figure out which schedule to do these on, but girls will be posted tomorrow morning.
The description from Week One was nice and concise, so here you go:
“Yeah, this is a bit of a dead zone in my coverage, and while I’m having fun going back through previous state meet ratings, I do want to throw a little something out there.
This type of track coverage on my end started two years ago and was really honed in on during last spring. Last spring’s version broke down groups by event category, assigned my own version of World Athletics Scores to each time, and then compiling all those to rank each crew.
These are calculated similarly. Thankfully, all the main collegiate events (800m, Mile, 3000m, and 5000m) have World Athletics scores associated.
For each of those four events, a team’s top times are averaged
These are up to the top-4, depending on how many of their athletes have competed in the event
From those averages, the corresponding World Athletics Score is found, then that score is multiplied by the number of athletes from each event
A school’s top three events are added together and those sums are then ranked
These are all marks that were on TFRRS as of Sunday night and contain those running for their school (no unattached athletes).
These aren’t predictive in any way, just a calculation based on what has already occurred. Hopefully, they’re a way to show which distance crews punch above their division and highlight which schools specialize in certain events. I’ll be doing these each week, alternating between women and men.“
Rank
Team
Division
Overall Score
1
Michigan
1
12336
2
Michigan State
1
12168
3
Grand Valley St.
2
12080
4
Eastern Michigan
1
11656
5
Central Michigan
1
11516
6
Oakland
1
11088
7
Western Michigan
1
11028
8
Saginaw Valley
2
10664
9
Wayne State
2
10536
10
Northern Michigan
2
10216
11
Hope
3
10012
12
Northwood
2
10012
13
Calvin
3
9952
14
Ferris State
2
9820
15
Hillsdale
2
9692
16
Cornerstone
NAIA
9624
17
Detroit Mercy
1
9492
18
Davenport
2
9368
19
Aquinas
NAIA
9048
20
Siena Heights
NAIA
8360
21
Adrian
3
7736
22
Spring Arbor
NAIA
7644
23
Madonna
NAIA
7592
24
Rochester
NAIA
6840
25
Albion
3
6789
26
Alma
3
6242
27
Concordia (Mich.)
NAIA
6104
28
Lake Superior State
2
5656
29
Olivet
3
5475
30
Cleary
NAIA
4774
31
St. Clair County CC
NJCAA
4263
32
Muskegon CC
NJCAA
3112
33
Lawrence Tech
NAIA
2599
34
SW Michigan
NJCAA
2483
JUST WHAT I’VE NOTICED
Although there wasn’t any movement in the Top Ten, the Calvin women made their way from 18th to 13th. A large factor in that was their debut in the 5k at GVSU’s Big Meet, where Jenna Allman (Saline) dropped into the 17’s for her first time ever. She was joined shortly after by Sophie Bull and the two are both ranked in the top-5 in the MIAA. Lansing Christian’s Natalie Tebben also impressed, dropping a 2 sec. PB in the 800m, her first official attempt at the distance in 9 months.
Michigan has always been an excellent mid-distance school, recruiting top athletes and developing those with potential. Sam Hastie gave us a glimpse of that potential during her senior year at Ann Arbor Huron, hitting 2:12 and 4:54. Now three years later, that potential has been realized. Her 2:06 at the Windy City Invite is a great lead up into this upcoming Big Ten Championship.
I’ve loved the progression of a few other girls as well:
Emily Paupore, Central Michigan – 11:15 (3200m) -> 9:22 3k
The description from the above link was nice and concise, so here you go:
“Yeah, this is a bit of a dead zone in my coverage, and while I’m having fun going back through previous state meet ratings, I do want to throw a little something out there.
This type of track coverage on my end started two years ago and was really honed in on during last spring. Last spring’s version broke down groups by event category, assigned my own version of World Athletics Scores to each time, and then compiling all those to rank each crew.
These are calculated similarly. Thankfully, all the main collegiate events (800m, Mile, 3000m, and 5000m) have World Athletics scores associated.
For each of those four events, a team’s top times are averaged
These are up to the top-4, depending on how many of their athletes have competed in the event
From those averages, the corresponding World Athletics Score is found, then that score is multiplied by the number of athletes from each event
A school’s top three events are added together and those sums are then ranked
These are all marks that were on TFRRS as of Sunday night and contain those running for their school (no unattached athletes).
These aren’t predictive in any way, just a calculation based on what has already occurred. Hopefully, they’re a way to show which distance crews punch above their division and highlight which schools specialize in certain events. I’ll be doing these each week, alternating between women and men.“
Rank
Team
Total
800m
Mile
3000m
5000m
1
Michigan
12672
4168
4280
4224
4036
2
Michigan State
12176
3748
4148
4108
3920
3
Grand Valley St.
11924
3880
4016
4028
3764
4
Saginaw Valley
11032
3696
3656
3680
3548
5
Eastern Michigan
10920
3740
3832
3316
3348
6
Oakland
10624
3388
3420
3664
3540
7
Northwood
10572
3232
3612
3632
3328
8
Hope
10500
3452
3520
3528
2976
9
Aquinas
10140
3320
3384
3436
3228
10
Hillsdale
9980
3580
3456
2944
2226
11
Spring Arbor
9736
3420
3328
2988
2732
12
Cornerstone
9728
3524
3196
3008
2608
13
Calvin
9444
2836
3172
3240
3032
14
Davenport
9120
3008
2475
3180
2932
15
Ferris State
9028
2040
3032
3064
2932
16
Detroit Mercy
8976
1576
3168
3064
2744
17
Lawrence Tech
8816
2956
3104
2756
689
18
Madonna
8360
2524
2860
2976
1875
19
Rochester
8340
2408
3020
2808
2512
20
Siena Heights
8164
3128
2664
2372
1156
21
Central Michigan
8130
806
1606
3400
3124
22
Adrian
7816
3004
2200
2484
2328
23
Albion
7448
2548
2516
2384
2032
24
Alma
6852
2588
2548
1716
676
25
Lake Superior State
6571
2144
2624
1803
594
26
Olivet
6487
2284
2268
1935
661
27
Concordia
6238
2464
2424
1350
755
28
Cleary
5614
2392
2196
1026
0
29
Muskegon CC
4489
1290
2380
819
0
30
SW Michigan
3061
826
1137
1098
0
31
St. Clair County CC
422
0
0
0
422
I HAVE THOUGHTS!
Michigan has a real shot of making some noise in the DMR. Last year, their team of Arjun Jha, Dubem Amene, Cole Johnson, and Nick Foster had the 6th fastest time in Division 1 and when they substituted Henry Johnson for Foster, the Wolverines placed 9th at Nationals. This year, Amene has shaved 0.6 seconds off his best indoor 400m, Foster has dropped time in the mile, Johnson has experience to handle the 1200, and perhaps you throw an All-Big Ten Miles Brown on there. I have no clue what time will be needed to place or what the other teams have, but you gotta imagine they’re an improvement from last year’s great squad.
Hope College’s Eli Meder and Connor Vachon have been on fire. Meder’s progression has been incredible, before his move to Holland, he’d never broken 2-flat or 4:30, now to 1:50 (finishing 6th at Meyo) and 4:09 at the Big Meet. That 800m mark is currently tied for the 4th fastest time in Division 3. On the other side of the equation, Vachon was a high school star over at Jenison, but we know that doesn’t always translate. After a cross season where he qualified for Nationals, he’s moved up to the longer distances during indoor and in the 3k, setting school record after school record. First, it was an 8:20 3k at Bill Clinger, now an 8:15 at the Big Meet.
Christopher Russelburg – 9:51 3200m -> 14:57 5000m
Jacob Singleton – 4:28 1600m -> 4:12 Mile
Of course there are many more athletes who have had breakthroughs, the above five are some that stood out as blasts from the pasts who had noteworthy performances in these prior two weeks.