Last Year
SUMMER PREVIEW
MID-SEASON
REGIONAL PROJECTIONS
THE RESULT
Girls
- Petoskey (16th)
- Ludington (19th)
- Cadillac (21st)
Boys
- Sparta (14th)
- Fremont (13th)
- Petoskey (18th)
Top 27 Teams
Previous years had top-25 teams, but there’s 27 (and sometimes more) team qualifiers and what does it hurt to add another two?
Girls
Ludington (13th)
Boys
Petoskey (9th), Gladwin (12th), Fremont (14th), Sparta (17th), Cadillac (23rd)


(If your team isn’t listed in the images above or the scores below, you probably don’t have five returners, at least on ol’ athletic.net. I’m sure many of these teams will fill out their rosters by late October)
Projected Scores
| Place | Girls Team | Score |
| 1 | Ludington | 55 |
| 2 | Cadillac | 99 |
| 3 | Petoskey | 114 |
| 4 | Gaylord | 117 |
| 5 | Sparta | 142 |
| 6 | Whitehall | 143 |
| 7 | Gladwin | 202 |
| 8 | Newaygo | 223 |
| 9 | Fremont | 224 |
| 10 | Big Rapids | 237 |
| 11 | Cheboygan | 271 |
| 12 | Muskegon Oakridge | 280 |
| 13 | Howard City-Tri County | 295 |
| 14 | Ogemaw Heights | 455 |
| Place | Boys Team | Score |
| 1 | Petoskey | 62 |
| 2 | Gladwin | 77 |
| 3 | Fremont | 80 |
| 4 | Sparta | 87 |
| 5 | Cadillac | 118 |
| 6 | Ludington | 144 |
| 7 | Big Rapids | 180 |
| 8 | Whitehall | 195 |
| 9 | Howard City-Tri County | 210 |
| 10 | Cheboygan | 323 |
| 11 | Ogemaw Heights | 342 |
| 12 | Gaylord | 348 |
| 13 | Newaygo | 365 |
Top Runners
Thought I’d give a review of some of the top returners in each region. Returners means no incoming freshman (you’ll get your days in the sun). If you’re on a top team or in the 50 Tickets and you’re projected highly here, you hit the jackpot! Yes, I’m writing a bit less than previous years, but I think I’ve learned my lesson in that I need to conserve energy and brainpower for all divisions and regions. Typically by August, I’m rushing to get these done. This time around, hopefully all regions get the same amount of coverage.
First high school season closed with nine consecutive sub-20’s and a 3rd place finish here.
Running two tougher courses late (here and MIS) may have not led to an accurate display of her fitness. Still, she ran low-19’s at both, placing 2nd here and nabbing her first All-State. But then time-wise, the real shoe dropped with an 18:25 at Shepherd.
Greatly excelled at the 3200m during track, finding her way into the 11’s for the first season ever, then placing 16th in Division 2.
So dang consistent in the 1600m this spring. During May, almost all of her efforts were +/- a few seconds from 5:20. That was enough to place 2nd in Region 11 and qualify for State, where she placed 18th.
You could tell his large leap during track was in the cards, as he moved from a mid-17 runner to one that was able to run 16:30 on this tough course and 16:19 on a MIS track that’s getting more difficult each year.
Competing for his Spartans, Gregory added to his trophy collection in track, gaining a OK Silver 1600m crown to go with his 3200m from last year.
On top of winning last fall’s regional, Nolan moved up from 13th to 4th in the BNC, 51st to 13th at State, and ran exactly a minute faster at the MITCA Meet of Champions.
Ran a ton of events for Gladwin (and for good reason – they made MITCA Team State, placing 7th), though usually was fresh for the 1600m. When you see multiple 4:23’s and a 9th place in Division 2, you know he’s the owner of some solid fitness.
Came on strong at the end of the fall, leading into a stellar track season where his 1600 and 3200m ranked in the top-5 amongst ALL the state’s freshmen boys.
Leading into his magnificent track season was a cross country campaign featuring his 2nd straight top-10 over here in Region 10.
3 thoughts on “The Regional Previews: Division 2, Region 10”