Blog

Uncategorized

2023 Regional Projections: Allendale Regional

Finally, the start of the season we’ve all been waiting for. Throw out all the fast times from September, but apply all the lessons learned through the summer and fall. Regional week is here and with it comes the many projections and previews I’ll write.

Just as last year and throughout the season, I’m projecting these using race simulations. Through a season’s worth of speed ratings, one can determine a runner’s average rating and the variability of those ratings. Both those factors are then weighed towards more recent meets, which are then simulated thousands of times using a Monte Carlo analysis (also described by TullyRunners here). Over those thousands of race simulations, one can determine a team’s average place and average score, a runner’s average place, odds on winning, and odds on qualifying.

These are useful in cross country scenarios, where you have consistent runners and those who are a bit more up and down. For example:

Tanner TimeTanner RatingTanner Avg.Tanner StDev.
15:30210  
15:45205  
16:00200  
16:15195  
16:301902007.91
MIXCSR TimeMIXCSR RatingMIXCSR Avg.MIXCSR StDev.
16:09197  
16:12196  
16:15195  
16:18194  
16:211931951.58

Jacob at his best might be faster than I in four of the five races during the season. I’d almost never be All-State in Division 1, but he might contend for a top-5 spot or place 60th.

If we did 20 simulations, this is how it might turn out:

RaceTanner Avg.Tanner StDevTanner RatingMIXCSR Avg.MIXCSR StDevMIXCSR Rating
12007.9202.11951.6195.6
22007.9196.21951.6194.1
32007.9190.01951.6199.2
42007.9193.41951.6192.5
52007.9206.81951.6195.7
62007.9201.81951.6196.1
72007.9171.61951.6194.9
82007.9189.21951.6195.9
92007.9205.51951.6197.0
102007.9203.81951.6192.6
112007.9192.31951.6196.5
122007.9196.91951.6196.4
132007.9198.51951.6195.6
142007.9203.21951.6194.1
152007.9193.91951.6192.6
162007.9199.31951.6193.2
172007.9208.71951.6194.2
182007.9213.71951.6194.6
192007.9212.61951.6197.1
202007.9206.31951.6193.9

I’d win four times, but I’d never have the ability to win a title like he had in Race 18. He’s usually All-State, but may cost his team a title through his effort in Race 7.

The simulations give the possibilities of those scenarios and all the various scoring scripts. A sixth girl that can pop off on any certain day, a reliable boy who always runs 17-flat, you name it. Hopefully, they better elucidate our contenders, qualifiers, and how these races play out over the weekend.

But always remember, races aren’t run on paper or on a computer. These projections are meant to better our sport, give more attention where little is given. Although I take pride in their accuracy, this endeavor would be quite boring if it were always perfect. I look forward to these being proven wrong and I expect to hear about it as well.

SUMMER PREVIEW
MID-SEASON

GIRLS

Ranked Teams

#3 Muskegon Western Michigan Christian
#6 Gobles
#7 Saugatuck
#24 St. Joseph Our Lady of the Lake Catholic

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

If I’m counting this right… 27th! Wow, that’s far back, but with three top-10 teams, I guess that’s what to expect.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Muskegon Western Michigan Christian331.19095+
2Gobles482.0995+
3Saugatuck583.095+
4St. Joseph Our Lady of the Lake Catholic1004.1
5Holland Calvary Christian1174.9
6Vermontville Maple Valley1716.0

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
111Grace VanderKooiMuskegon Western Michigan Christian1.0
29Libby SmithGobles2.0
39Veyda ConleyMartin5.4
49Ava DeYoungGobles5.4
512Allison GlendeningSt. Joseph Our Lady of the Lake Catholic6.0
69Lyvia CurtisSaugatuck7.6
79Leah SnellerMuskegon Western Michigan Christian7.6
89Lauren ShafferGobles7.8
912Eleanor KingshottMuskegon Western Michigan Christian8.1
109Kamryn SixberrySaugatuck9.1
1112Grace FolkemaMuskegon Western Michigan Christian9.4
129Kaylie RiksenMuskegon Western Michigan Christian11.3
1310Madison CooleyGobles14.1
1412Anna McQuearySaugatuck15.2
1511Brielle VoorheesTri-Unity Christian15.3
1611Leilani SchoonmakerSaugatuck15.8
1711Morgan LawrenceMuskegon Western Michigan Christian16.1
1811Alayah NieuwsmaSaugatuck18.1
1912Abby KunkleLibertas Christian18.4
2010Acacia WilliamsHolland Calvary Christian19.2
2112Leah PrinsByron Center Zion Christian23.1
2211Mary RileySt. Joseph Our Lady of the Lake Catholic25.0
2311Hallie LindaleMuskegon Western Michigan Christian26.2
2410Aribel MillsSt. Joseph Our Lady of the Lake Catholic26.4
2511Hannah HysellSt. Joseph Our Lady of the Lake Catholic26.9
2612Deanna WoodGobles27.0
2712Madilyn DeRuiterByron Center Zion Christian28.1
289Lilly FaurotVermontville Maple Valley28.1
298Laura RotmanHolland Calvary Christian28.8
3011Olivia LaningaHolland Calvary Christian29.0

BOYS

Ranked Teams

#3 Saugatuck
#4 Holland Calvary Christian
#7 Muskegon Western Michigan Christian
#18 Tri-Unity Christian
#21 Muskegon Catholic Central

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

20th Place. Once again, three top-10 teams, but this time a bit more depth behind those three dominant boys teams.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Saugatuck491.36995+
2Holland Calvary Christian552.02895+
3Muskegon Western Michigan Christian622.795+
4Tri-Unity Christian1054.1
5Muskegon Catholic Central1214.9
6St. Joseph Our Lady of the Lake Catholic1496.0
7Byron Center Zion Christian1887.0
8Libertas Christian2008.0
9Gobles2419.0

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
111Matthias MorseMuskegon Western Michigan Christian1.4
211Tyler LaansmaTri-Unity Christian2.7
310Sammy GamboaSaugatuck4.4
49Sawyer MonroeSaugatuck4.6
59Riley WeedHolland Calvary Christian5.4
612Graeson LawrenceMuskegon Western Michigan Christian6.1
78Lincoln LaansmaTri-Unity Christian7.9
812Myles TilmaByron Center Zion Christian8.1
99Noah SchipperHolland Calvary Christian8.3
109Gibson WhiteHolland Calvary Christian8.7
119Marcus SilvaSaugatuck11.3
1210Brennan NorSaugatuck12.6
1312Jacob LyonnaisMuskegon Catholic Central12.9
149Christian GetzHolland Calvary Christian13.8
159Grant RehkopfSaugatuck16.7
1610Reuben AndersonMuskegon Western Michigan Christian16.8
179Owen SytsemaMuskegon Western Michigan Christian17.5
1812Owen LyonnaisMuskegon Catholic Central18.0
1911Caleb OudbierTri-Unity Christian22.0
2012Matthew LageSt. Joseph Our Lady of the Lake Catholic22.2
2111Alexander LawrenceMuskegon Western Michigan Christian22.4
2212Alexander GordilloLibertas Christian23.5
2312Danny MaatMuskegon Western Michigan Christian23.9
249Elijah LaningaHolland Calvary Christian24.0
259Caleb AdkinsHolland Calvary Christian24.3
269Eli LaningaHolland Calvary Christian24.9
2710Ryer CampbellMuskegon Western Michigan Christian25.5
2812Jack WalkenhorstMuskegon Catholic Central26.2
2911Kalen LoebachSt. Joseph Our Lady of the Lake Catholic26.9
3012Owen McLoughlinSt. Joseph Our Lady of the Lake Catholic29.8

SUMMER PREVIEW
MID-SEASON

GIRLS

Ranked Teams

#3 Grand Rapids Covenant Christian
#16 Kent City
#17 Fennville
#25 Grandville Calvin Christian

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

17th Place. After Covenant’s pack and the elite KC/Fennville girls, there’ll be a few spots for the taking.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Grand Rapids Covenant Christian431.095+95+
2Kent City862.295+
3Fennville962.895+
4Grandville Calvin Christian1184.0
5The Potter’s House1435.1
6Montague1747.1
7Shelby1747.1
8Saranac1777.4
9Grand Rapids NorthPointe Christian1898.4
10Delton-Kellogg2229.9
11Holland Black River26711.0
12Ravenna36012.0

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
111Lila VolkersKent City1.0
212Amber KooleGrand Rapids Covenant Christian2.1
39Isabelle SliterFennville3.6
412Isabella MaxKent City4.6
59Shelby KuiperGrand Rapids Covenant Christian5.4
611Lola BryceGrandville Calvin Christian6.1
712Gracie HoutmanKent City6.7
89Lydia SoelbergShelby9.6
912Abbie WiegersNorth Muskegon9.8
1012Nidia MartinezFennville10.2
119Lydia MinderhoudGrand Rapids Covenant Christian12.0
1212Lindsay MinderhoudGrand Rapids Covenant Christian12.3
139Anna DeVriesGrand Rapids Covenant Christian13.4
1411Hannah GeaneyThe Potter’s House13.4
159Marnath TuolGrandville Calvin Christian13.9
1612Cammie EricksonMontague15.4
1712Lauren JousmaGrandville Calvin Christian17.5
189Jenna TerpstraGrand Rapids NorthPointe Christian18.6
1911Alyssa PossehnSaranac19.3
2010Sylvia SkujinsNorth Muskegon19.6
2110Samantha GilesFennville21.7
2212Nora BallardHolland Black River23.8
2312Ivy AndreasThe Potter’s House24.2
2411Grace TorschMontague26.9
2512Erika BylsmaGrand Rapids Covenant Christian27.2
2610Amber KuiperGrand Rapids Covenant Christian27.8
279Noel ParkerShelby28.5
2812Summer RitchieDelton-Kellogg29.6
2911Christina MendozaFennville29.9
3010Melanie ThorntonGrand Rapids NorthPointe Christian30.5

BOYS

Ranked Teams

#3 Grand Rapids Covenant Christian
#7 The Potter’s House
#24 Holland Black River

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

15th, baby!

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Grand Rapids Covenant Christian501.095+95+
2The Potter’s House712.095+
3Holland Black River1243.471
4Kent City1354.123
5Saranac1495.1
6Grand Rapids NorthPointe Christian1565.8
7Montague1666.8
8Shelby1837.8
9North Muskegon2129.0
10Grandville Calvin Christian27510.6
11Delton-Kellogg29211.5
12Ravenna29611.6
13Fennville31212.3

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
112Samuel MartiniKent City1.5
212Jackson RodriguezThe Potter’s House2.2
311Levi KampsGrand Rapids Covenant Christian3.5
49Graeson DeckerGrand Rapids Covenant Christian5.2
511Isaac EdgingtonHolland Black River6.0
612Brodie DelamaterGrant6.0
712Nathan DaySaranac6.6
812Trevor DornbosGrandville Calvin Christian8.8
99Jonas BallardHolland Black River10.2
1011Luke DykstraGrand Rapids Covenant Christian10.5
1112Ezra HagedornThe Potter’s House11.1
1212Hunter HelminskiSaranac11.8
1310Noah RaethMontague13.2
1412Jaren VogelKent City15.6
1512Noah FintonThe Potter’s House16.5
1612Grant KooleGrand Rapids Covenant Christian16.6
1712Tanner SoelbergShelby18.0
1811Tyler N. KooiengaGrand Rapids Covenant Christian19.2
1910Luke TibbeGrand Rapids NorthPointe Christian19.4
2012Evan Atkinson-MillerNorth Muskegon20.4
2110Edward MugishaThe Potter’s House21.5
229Caleb SwineyThe Potter’s House23.3
2312Caleb DrnekGrand Rapids Covenant Christian23.5
2411Ethan RimmerDelton-Kellogg24.5
2510Iziquiel PiconShelby25.4
2612Clay JohnsonMontague26.8
2711Alix DravesMontague27.7
2812Connor LubbersGrand Rapids Covenant Christian28.9
2910Isaac NorcrossGrand Rapids NorthPointe Christian30.5
3012Micah FryeShelby32.2

SUMMER PREVIEW
MID-SEASON

GIRLS

Ranked Teams

#1 Grand Rapids Christian
#5 Zeeland East
#6 Spring Lake
#8 Holland Christian
#14 Hudsonville Unity Christian

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

16th to 17th Place. An insanely strong GR Christian squad takes up much of the top seven spots, but there’s plenty of individuals who’ll come in after.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Grand Rapids Christian261.095+95+
2Zeeland East792.195+
3Spring Lake993.456
4Holland Christian1013.546
5Hudsonville Unity Christian1265.0
6Fruitport1726.0
7Grand Rapids Catholic Central2017.0
8Allendale2528.9
9Holland2569.3
10Coopersville2569.3
11Grand Rapids West Catholic27110.5
12Hamilton32312.0
13Grand River Preparatory40313.2
14Wyoming Lee41513.8

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
112Natalie VanOtterenGrand Rapids Christian1.1
211Emma DrnekZeeland East3.2
312Emily TomesGrand Rapids Catholic Central3.6
410Ellie ScholmaGrand Rapids Christian3.8
510Lilah PoelGrand Rapids Christian5.3
612Payton HoltzGrand Rapids Christian7.3
712Naomi NelsonGrand Rapids Christian8.4
812Allison KuzmaZeeland East8.9
99Olivia HollebeekHolland Christian9.0
1012Tatum DykstraFruitport11.3
1112Kyla MeyersSpring Lake11.7
129Johanna MulderHolland12.4
139Eliana StobHolland Christian12.6
1412Bea ReeserSpring Lake14.5
1512Maddie BoschHudsonville Unity Christian14.6
169Ellery LampenHolland Christian15.9
1712Claire MarosiGrand Rapids Catholic Central17.8
1812Adia SikkemaGrand Rapids Christian18.7
1910Taryn DiLauraZeeland East18.7
2010Alexis KotkowiczSpring Lake18.9
2110Annika TerBeekGrand Rapids Christian19.9
229Carly BruxvoortHudsonville Unity Christian25.0
2311Sierra GrootersHudsonville Unity Christian25.2
2411Lexie RuffingSpring Lake25.3
2510Meredith CookZeeland East26.3
2610CC KurasZeeland East28.2
279Mackenzie HuizengaHolland Christian28.7
2811Maddie BruxvoortHudsonville Unity Christian28.7
2910Megan KuzmaZeeland East28.8
3012Lauren LeeFruitport29.5

BOYS

Ranked Teams

#2 Allendale
#3 Grand Rapids Christian
#11 Holland Christian
#15 Spring Lake
#20 Hamilton

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

21st place on either Holland Christian or Spring Lake qualifying scenarios.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Allendale451.45995+
2Grand Rapids Christian471.64195+
3Holland Christian1063.369
4Spring Lake1163.831
5Hamilton1455.1
6Grand Rapids Catholic Central1655.9
7Zeeland East2117.5
8Fruitport2168.0
9Holland2278.6
10Hudsonville Unity Christian2609.9
11Comstock Park32511.2
12Coopersville33711.8
13Grand River Preparatory38413.4
14Grand Rapids West Catholic38913.6

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
112Noah LambersHolland1.8
211Simon TriezenbergGrand Rapids Christian2.6
310Ronnie SilveiraAllendale3.3
411Kilian WhalenAllendale3.9
511Will EngbersHolland Christian5.1
611Abatu DykstraHamilton8.5
711Parker TiethofAllendale8.9
811Jeb HillaryGrand Rapids Catholic Central9.8
911Keegan HoekstraGrand Rapids Christian10.7
1012Luke GlasgowSpring Lake10.7
1111Ben GrossAllendale10.8
1210Sean RyanGrand Rapids Christian11.3
1312Dylan ClarkGrand Rapids Christian12.3
1412Jonathan KoetjeGrand Rapids Christian15.6
1512Ian RichthammerGrand Rapids Catholic Central16.1
1612Peter KuperusGrand Rapids Christian17.0
1710Micah SmallGrand Rapids Christian18.7
1811Will WhitmoreHolland Christian19.0
1911Parker WoodwykSpring Lake19.0
209Mason HillAllendale19.1
2111Caden GuffeyZeeland East20.2
2210Aden AshworthAllendale22.9
2311Aidan BrinksHolland Christian23.7
2411Aiden KasprzakGrand Rapids Catholic Central24.4
2511Andrew CommeretComstock Park24.7
2610Lukus MendozaSpring Lake25.4
2711Vincent PollockFruitport26.7
2810Landon GerritsmaHolland Christian29.7
2911Brayden RynsburgerHolland Christian30.5
3011Noah HernandezHamilton30.9

SUMMER PREVIEW
MID-SEASON

GIRLS

Ranked Teams

#4 Holland West Ottawa
#5 Grand Haven
#12 Rockford
#21 Jenison
#27 Zeeland West

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

I have the top-3 teams occupying 70% of the top-20 spots, sending the last individual qualifier back as far as 22nd.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Holland West Ottawa411.18695+
2Grand Haven551.91495+
3Rockford793.095+
4Jenison1214.3
5Zeeland West1385.3
6Hudsonville1425.6
7Grandville1927.1
8Cedar Springs2208.2
9Muskegon Reeths-Puffer2378.8
10Muskegon Mona Shores2679.8
11Grand Rapids Northview32511.0
12Grand Rapids Kenowa Hills36412.0
13Grand Rapids Union40213.0
14Wyoming45814.0

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
110Ava PorrasHolland West Ottawa1.8
211Valerie BeeckGrand Haven2.1
310Addie BirkholzHolland West Ottawa3.1
411Chloe DeRidderGrandville4.5
511Jordyn KlaasenZeeland West7.8
610Cianah Budnik-RamosGrand Haven8.5
711Jane OlneyHolland West Ottawa8.7
811Addy SmithGrand Haven9.1
99Daisy CoxRockford9.8
109Cassie KarasinskiHudsonville11.5
1110Trinity VanderWoudeRockford13.4
1211Emma SmithRockford13.4
1312Maddie Vande BunteJenison14.0
1411Emma GunnettHolland West Ottawa14.3
1511Abi AlbrightGrand Haven15.0
1611Naomi DiekmanJenison15.5
1710Jersi BilekMuskegon Reeths-Puffer15.6
1811Natalie LewisRockford17.9
199Lyla DowlingHolland West Ottawa21.9
2011Gracey BarryGrand Haven23.1
2111Helen SachsHolland West Ottawa23.2
2212Tessa RindflieschZeeland West24.5
2311Julia FramptonHolland West Ottawa25.1
2412Payton HosleyGrand Haven26.7
2510Macy GuikemaJenison27.8
269Paige McMeansJenison28.2
2711Melana KarstenRockford28.5
2812Reiel GhigliaHudsonville28.8
2911Klea VerstrateHudsonville29.1
3012Laurel TolliverGrand Haven30.3

BOYS

Ranked Teams

#3 Grand Haven
#11 Jenison
#22 Zeeland West
#23 East Kentwood

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

18th Place.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Grand Haven381.095+95+
2Jenison662.195+
3Zeeland West892.995+
4Rockford1324.4
5Holland West Ottawa1384.7
6Grandville1726.6
7Muskegon Reeths-Puffer1736.7
8Cedar Springs1948.1
9Hudsonville2038.5
10Grand Rapids Northview30810.1
11Muskegon Mona Shores32311.0
12Grand Rapids Union35112.0
13Grand Rapids Kenowa Hills39713.0
14Wyoming43114.0
15Muskegon48315.0

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
112Seth NorderGrand Haven1.1
211Seth ConnerJenison1.9
311Mason LucasJenison3.5
411Ben EisnorGrand Haven5.5
512Jaxon AllenMuskegon Reeths-Puffer6.6
69Luka HammondGrand Haven6.8
711Carter LivermoreGrandville6.8
812Roman SmithGrand Haven9.0
910Robert DoddZeeland West10.4
1010Ethan ShoffnerCedar Springs10.9
1112Jack DeKruyterZeeland West11.4
1210Keagan SmithZeeland West14.0
139Caden LivermoreGrandville15.6
1411Kye GrantMuskegon Reeths-Puffer16.6
1510Aron GalGrand Haven17.0
1612Max VangrouwHolland West Ottawa17.1
1711Matthew SchwartzJenison17.4
1811Noah SchuetteRockford17.7
1911Parker StreleckiJenison19.8
2012Carson HauchZeeland West20.1
2110Aiden WellerCedar Springs23.7
2211Dominic OttoJenison23.8
2310Caleb TeBrakeGrand Rapids Northview23.8
2412Gavin BettenRockford24.2
2511Carson BerkoGrand Haven24.3
2611Levi JongekrygHolland West Ottawa26.2
2712Tate BradleyMuskegon Reeths-Puffer26.2
2812Nate FaheyRockford26.5
2910Hayden LaffertyRockford28.2
3010Jake FollettHolland West Ottawa29.6
Uncategorized

2023 Regional Projections: Clarkston Regional

Finally, the start of the season we’ve all been waiting for. Throw out all the fast times from September, but apply all the lessons learned through the summer and fall. Regional week is here and with it comes the many projections and previews I’ll write.

Just as last year and throughout the season, I’m projecting these using race simulations. Through a season’s worth of speed ratings, one can determine a runner’s average rating and the variability of those ratings. Both those factors are then weighed towards more recent meets, which are then simulated thousands of times using a Monte Carlo analysis (also described by TullyRunners here). Over those thousands of race simulations, one can determine a team’s average place and average score, a runner’s average place, odds on winning, and odds on qualifying.

These are useful in cross country scenarios, where you have consistent runners and those who are a bit more up and down. For example:

Tanner TimeTanner RatingTanner Avg.Tanner StDev.
15:30210  
15:45205  
16:00200  
16:15195  
16:301902007.91
MIXCSR TimeMIXCSR RatingMIXCSR Avg.MIXCSR StDev.
16:09197  
16:12196  
16:15195  
16:18194  
16:211931951.58

Jacob at his best might be faster than I in four of the five races during the season. I’d almost never be All-State in Division 1, but he might contend for a top-5 spot or place 60th.

If we did 20 simulations, this is how it might turn out:

RaceTanner Avg.Tanner StDevTanner RatingMIXCSR Avg.MIXCSR StDevMIXCSR Rating
12007.9202.11951.6195.6
22007.9196.21951.6194.1
32007.9190.01951.6199.2
42007.9193.41951.6192.5
52007.9206.81951.6195.7
62007.9201.81951.6196.1
72007.9171.61951.6194.9
82007.9189.21951.6195.9
92007.9205.51951.6197.0
102007.9203.81951.6192.6
112007.9192.31951.6196.5
122007.9196.91951.6196.4
132007.9198.51951.6195.6
142007.9203.21951.6194.1
152007.9193.91951.6192.6
162007.9199.31951.6193.2
172007.9208.71951.6194.2
182007.9213.71951.6194.6
192007.9212.61951.6197.1
202007.9206.31951.6193.9

I’d win four times, but I’d never have the ability to win a title like he had in Race 18. He’s usually All-State, but may cost his team a title through his effort in Race 7.

The simulations give the possibilities of those scenarios and all the various scoring scripts. A sixth girl that can pop off on any certain day, a reliable boy who always runs 17-flat, you name it. Hopefully, they better elucidate our contenders, qualifiers, and how these races play out over the weekend.

But always remember, races aren’t run on paper or on a computer. These projections are meant to better our sport, give more attention where little is given. Although I take pride in their accuracy, this endeavor would be quite boring if it were always perfect. I look forward to these being proven wrong and I expect to hear about it as well.

SUMMER PREVIEW
MID-SEASON

GIRLS

Ranked Teams

#11 Oxford
#17 Clarkston
#18 Utica
#23 Rochester
#26 Lake Orion

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

18th place. Seems the contenders for qualifying have plenty of runners in that 5th to 15th range.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Oxford561.19495+
2Clarkston782.5590
3Utica812.890
4Rochester994.213
5Lake Orion1034.57
6Rochester Adams1476.4
7Troy1576.7
8Bloomfield Hills1927.9
9Utica Ford3099.5
10Troy Athens3149.6
11Sterling Heights Stevenson34811.0
12Waterford Mott37612.2
13Warren Cousino39213.2
14Warren Mott40513.9
15Waterford Kettering41514.7

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
111Lucy CookRochester1.1
211Mallory BigelowOxford2.1
312Braydee EllingOxford3.9
412Hannah DeRoeckLake Orion4.8
510Addison HerrBloomfield Hills5.1
610Audrey HamiltonTroy7.3
79Emma BrownUtica8.2
89Linda LopezLake Orion8.9
910Siene MuraszewskiUtica9.6
1011Taylor BrodeurOxford10.4
1112Alexandra BrighamClarkston12.2
129Avery DeGrendelClarkston15.3
1312Anna ReineckClarkston15.6
1410Taylor ParsonsRochester15.9
159Addison BrighamClarkston16.1
1610Brooke McFarlandUtica16.7
1711Norah LesnerUtica18.3
189El McMahanRochester Adams18.5
1912Aubrey MeryOxford20.5
2011Jamie PattersonOxford20.9
2110Sydney FischerClarkston21.3
2211Kaitlyn KauppilaRochester Adams23.4
2311Stephanie BulatRochester23.5
2411Madie MillerTroy26.1
2511Mia SnellgroveRochester26.3
269Mary GravesLake Orion27.4
2710Laila BodellOxford27.7
289Olivia JennyBloomfield Hills28.0
2911Sophia AquinoUtica29.9
309Annie RoraffRochester32.5

Anything Intriguing?

I’ve been really impressed with Utica’s ability to handle adversity this season. Missing their top runner for the past two months may have derailed a weaker team, but these girls have come together stronger. They’ll face qualifying challenges from a Clarkston, who had the race of their lives at last fall’s regional and a young Rochester squad.

BOYS

Ranked Teams

#7 Oxford
#9 Troy
#16 Clarkston
#18 Utica
#26 Lake Orion

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

15th to 16th place.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Oxford691.75495+
2Troy752.02395+
3Clarkston822.72276
4Utica973.826
5Lake Orion1244.9
6Troy Athens1746.8
7Rochester Adams1756.9
8Rochester1787.1
9Utica Ford2529.6
10Warren Cousino2549.6
11Bloomfield Hills28010.8
12Sterling Heights Stevenson35312.2
13Waterford Kettering36713.0
14Waterford Mott39113.9
15Warren Mott49415.3
16Auburn Hills Avondale50015.7

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
112Vishvaa RavishankarTroy1.9
211Taye LevensonBloomfield Hills2.2
311Kian SchneeweisTroy3.1
411Alexander McArthurOxford4.3
510Harper WesleyUtica4.5
611James CusickOxford8.0
712Bryce NowikClarkston9.7
811Raymond Lucero IILake Orion10.1
912Louis D’SouzaTroy12.8
1011Cayden DeGrendelClarkston13.3
1112Ethan MuraszewskiUtica14.2
1211Max MyrandOxford15.1
1312Jacob EsserTroy Athens17.0
1410Ryan BarnesClarkston17.1
1510Nate LindenTroy Athens17.3
1612Aiden JanesRochester Adams17.8
1712Lucas AmesOxford19.6
1811Luke MorehouseUtica19.8
1911Napolean LinoRochester21.0
2011Blake PeardonLake Orion21.6
2112Cass FeeneyOxford22.2
2210Dylan PascoeRochester22.7
2312Andrew FlorosClarkston22.9
2412Oliver HouseLake Orion23.0
2511Akshat AroraTroy24.2
2612Silas SmithUtica26.8
2711Joshua EllingsworthClarkston27.5
2811Reynold WeiRochester Adams28.1
2912Dylan EsserTroy Athens28.8
3012Johnathan MitchellUtica Ford28.9

Anything Intriguing?

You could make arguments for any combination of these top four teams to be the state squad. Utica pulled a major upset last year, Clarkston is on their home course, Oxford has stepped up to the plate in large invites, and Troy looks to capitalize on their potential shown at Jackson and re-write the wrongs of the County and OAA Red championships. Whatever it is, a top-15 squad is likely staying home and three other top-15 squads are moving on.

Uncategorized

2023 Regional Projections: Happy Acres Regional

Finally, the start of the season we’ve all been waiting for. Throw out all the fast times from September, but apply all the lessons learned through the summer and fall. Regional week is here and with it comes the many projections and previews I’ll write.

Just as last year and throughout the season, I’m projecting these using race simulations. Through a season’s worth of speed ratings, one can determine a runner’s average rating and the variability of those ratings. Both those factors are then weighed towards more recent meets, which are then simulated thousands of times using a Monte Carlo analysis (also described by TullyRunners here). Over those thousands of race simulations, one can determine a team’s average place and average score, a runner’s average place, odds on winning, and odds on qualifying.

These are useful in cross country scenarios, where you have consistent runners and those who are a bit more up and down. For example:

Tanner TimeTanner RatingTanner Avg.Tanner StDev.
15:30210  
15:45205  
16:00200  
16:15195  
16:301902007.91
MIXCSR TimeMIXCSR RatingMIXCSR Avg.MIXCSR StDev.
16:09197  
16:12196  
16:15195  
16:18194  
16:211931951.58

Jacob at his best might be faster than I in four of the five races during the season. I’d almost never be All-State in Division 1, but he might contend for a top-5 spot or place 60th.

If we did 20 simulations, this is how it might turn out:

RaceTanner Avg.Tanner StDevTanner RatingMIXCSR Avg.MIXCSR StDevMIXCSR Rating
12007.9202.11951.6195.6
22007.9196.21951.6194.1
32007.9190.01951.6199.2
42007.9193.41951.6192.5
52007.9206.81951.6195.7
62007.9201.81951.6196.1
72007.9171.61951.6194.9
82007.9189.21951.6195.9
92007.9205.51951.6197.0
102007.9203.81951.6192.6
112007.9192.31951.6196.5
122007.9196.91951.6196.4
132007.9198.51951.6195.6
142007.9203.21951.6194.1
152007.9193.91951.6192.6
162007.9199.31951.6193.2
172007.9208.71951.6194.2
182007.9213.71951.6194.6
192007.9212.61951.6197.1
202007.9206.31951.6193.9

I’d win four times, but I’d never have the ability to win a title like he had in Race 18. He’s usually All-State, but may cost his team a title through his effort in Race 7.

The simulations give the possibilities of those scenarios and all the various scoring scripts. A sixth girl that can pop off on any certain day, a reliable boy who always runs 17-flat, you name it. Hopefully, they better elucidate our contenders, qualifiers, and how these races play out over the weekend.

But always remember, races aren’t run on paper or on a computer. These projections are meant to better our sport, give more attention where little is given. Although I take pride in their accuracy, this endeavor would be quite boring if it were always perfect. I look forward to these being proven wrong and I expect to hear about it as well.

SUMMER PREVIEW
MID-SEASON

GIRLS

Ranked Teams

#1 Whitmore Lake
#14 Novi Christian Academy
#21 Lansing Christian
#25 Fowler
#27 Livingston Christian

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

17th Place, behind all them Whitmore Lake Trojans.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Whitmore Lake211.095+95+
2Novi Christian Academy732.195+
3Lansing Christian852.995+
4Fowler1054.3
5Livingston Christian1084.8
6Portland St. Patrick1235.9
7Byron1977.0

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
19Kaylie LivingstonWhitmore Lake1.0
210Carina BurchiWhitmore Lake2.2
310Taylor WiegandLivingston Christian3.9
410Sofia RobertsonWhitmore Lake4.5
512Natalie MeadowsWhitmore Lake4.9
612Isabella YeomanGenesee5.5
712Ellayna MeredithPortland St. Patrick8.1
811Kelcie PungFowler8.7
99Adrienne MitchellLansing Christian9.3
1010Elodie WeaverWhitmore Lake10.8
1111Ava MustaphaLansing Christian13.1
1212Mya GuillermoNovi Christian Academy13.3
138Madison MarkowiczNovi Christian Academy14.0
1410Abigail YatoomaNovi Christian Academy15.3
1511Brooke SonnenbergGenesee Christian Academy17.5
169Ezrielle MartinLivingston Christian18.5
1711Autumn ReynoldsPotterville18.7
189Marian DavlinPortland St. Patrick19.2
1912Josie DubucNovi Christian Academy19.8
2012Ciara ParsonsWhitmore Lake21.4
2112Autumn TroupeNovi Christian Academy21.8
2212Rebecca SmithFowler22.5
2310Juliette TallonLansing Christian22.6
249Isabella HalfmannFowler23.9
2510Averie ZinnGenesee25.3
2611Isabella Nelson-DanielsWhitmore Lake25.8
278Abigail GalazkaLivingston Christian26.4
289Annie WernetLansing Christian28.9
2912Grace O’HareFowler29.9
3012Hope TebbenLansing Christian30.1

BOYS

Ranked Teams

#23 Whitmore Lake

Projected Individual Qualifier Cutoff

Get in the top-15! My guess is 80% of the top-10 finishers are from non-qualifying teams.

Projected PlaceTeamAvg. ScoreAvg. PlaceWin %Top 3 %
1Whitmore Lake711.095+95+
2Novi Christian Academy1122.394
3Fowler1223.173
4Lansing Christian1384.712
5Byron1404.916
6Portland St. Patrick1435.4
7Waterford Our Lady of the Lakes1657.1
8Webberville1848.4
9Livingston Christian1858.5
10Potterville2069.9
11Genesee22410.8
12Genesee Christian Academy25211.9
13Morrice30313.0

Projected PlaceGradeNameTeamAvg. Place
110Landen LivingstonWhitmore Lake1.5
210Timothy ChamberlainPortland St. Patrick2.4
312Connor RouseGenesee3.0
412Trevor FeldpauschFowler5.0
510Josiah JohncoxByron5.4
612Ethan GrayByron9.2
710Quentin SmithFowler9.3
810Tyler LangfeldtPotterville9.8
910Ben YoungLansing Christian10.8
1011Aaron CrittendenPotterville11.7
1111Nate DillonWhitmore Lake12.2
129Benjamin FoxWhitmore Lake14.1
1310Isaac FoxElsterPortland St. Patrick14.6
1410Nathan CamilleriWaterford Our Lady of the Lakes14.7
1510Gavin HoweryWebberville15.5
1610Reuben JiranNovi Christian Academy16.6
1712Luke ShentonNovi Christian Academy17.8
1811Karl WegnerWaterford Our Lady of the Lakes18.2
1912Reily HendersonWhitmore Lake18.7
2011Samuel HubbardLivingston Christian19.0
2110Ethan WestWebberville19.8
2212Jobe SkaffNovi Christian Academy21.2
2310Ian FergusonGenesee Christian Academy22.9
2411Caleb ValentineWhitmore Lake24.8
258Trey JohnsonLivingston Christian24.9
2612Ryan WilliamsNovi Christian Academy25.8
2710Matias GreveLansing Christian26.1
289Landon MillerFowler26.2
299Francis AustenPortland St. Patrick27.3
309Nolan GallagherNovi Christian Academy30.8